Skip to main content

Whether to focus on stockturn or margin

At the Newsagents Federation conference in Birmingham this week, Imperial Tobacco, the UK's market leader, suggested to retailers that they should focus less on cigarette margins, at 6.6 per cent, and more on stockturn, at 183 times a year.

Using a simple model, general manager Amal Pramanik, showed that the 50 per cent margin offered by toothbrushes which turned over four times a year, offered a cash return of £200 a year for every £100 invested. Cigarettes, in contrast, would earn a retailer £1,200 for every £100 invested.

It is a simple illustration and holds true even when retailers add on investment in assets, such as the space occupied by the product. In order to measure how well you are doing, you need to understand what return you get when you multiply your margin by your stockturn.

Mr Pramanik's purpose in reminding retailers of this fact is to head off increasing pressure from retailers for a rise in the margin that they get on cigarettes. However, his reminder is also useful as many retailers focus on margin and miss the impact of stock turn.

Partly this is because of the way that cash and carry wholesalers compete on margins on key stock keeping units, which tends to make the headlines. It is also difficult to apply a universal stock turn figure to an SKU because that depends on the type of outlet it heads towards (in a dentist's, for example, you are going to make more money selling toothbrushes).

But another reason may be that many retailers are not measuring stockturn and favouring the products that generate the best cash returns.

Comments

  1. http://cherilynstores.blogspot.com/2008/09/which-products-have-highest-profit-for.html

    I willdo a follow up on BR on this theme.

    Steve

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Digital disruption in the UK wholesale space

“Twenty years ago I was driving boxes to the post office in my Chevy Blazer and dreaming of a forklift,” says Jeff Bezos in his most recent letter to shareholders. A blink later and he points out that the company has grown from 30,000 employees in 2010 to 230,000 now. But his ambition is the same. “We want to be a large company that’s also an invention machine. We want to combine the extraordinary customer-serving capabilities that are enabled by size with the speed of movement, nimbleness and risk-acceptance mentality that is normally associated with entrepreneurial start-ups.” Amazon is great at disruption because of its customers focus and the fact that the internet means it needs none (or very few) people between its warehouses and the shopper. The threat of Prime, its membership service, is the biggest challenge facing the UK retail market and the wholesale market by extension. It is both a direct threat and an indirect threat in that is inspiring countless numbers of othe...

Traffic lights: a fuss about nothing

I am sure that FT columnist Michael Skapinker has written about traffic lights food labelling before and his latest article is provocatively called: The food companies that make people fat. He criticises Coca-Cola and Unilever for sticking with guideline daily amounts (GDAs) when traffic lights work much better. Former Walmart Europe public affairs head Bernard Hughes wrote in to support Skapinker. He said: "There isn't ever a perfect information system flowing with beautiful logic. But traffic lights give powerful direction to the busy consumer." But in this age of smart phones surely this debate over the labelling on the packaging is easily overcome. The government can simply issue an app that when held over a bar code provides shoppers with a traffic light system. The supermarkets could do this on their websites. Surely the whole point about the future is that the internet and limitless data storage means that the shopper is being empowered with the informatio...

Sunday trading consultation: fair or fixed? You decide.

My local council, South Oxfordshire, asked me to complete a survey on Sunday trading as a local resident. The deadline is next week. The first question was about the current arrangements and what I thought. There were five options: large shops shouldn’t open six hours is already too long current restrictions are about right large shops should be allowed open for longer no restrictions. My answer was the current restrictions are about right. The next question was about what would happen if the council allowed large stores to open for longer. The menu included 10 options and a space for other. The options were that it would: encourage me to shop more in my local town give me more flexibility impact on my religious or cultural beliefs have a positive impact on my business have a negative impact on my business increase footfall to my business reduce footfall to my business provide more employment opportunities open to me in the local area mean that I need to...