Skip to main content

The resilience of tobacco

Higher taxes give tobacco companies the "cover to raise prices" which means the tobacco industry is in rude health, an analysis in the FT's Lex column today shows. For local shops, which depend on tobacco sales to generate footfall, this means that they do not have to rethink their strategy anytime soon.

In the US in 2009, a 25 per cent rise in cigarette prices caused consumption to fall by 8 per cent, which was "bang in line" with the impact of the 87 per cent rise in prices since 1969 (adjusted for inflation). Based on this, investment bank UBS argues that tobacco manufacturers can sustain price increases of 4 to 5 per cent a year (8 to 9 per cent for retail prices) for the next 10 years, while absorbing consumption declines of 3 to 4  per cent.

What is good news for the tobacco manufacturers may not be good news for tobacco retailers, who might read into these numbers that the former could afford to be more generous with margins. However, they also need to fight to retain shoppers.

Speaking at last week's NFRN conference, Charles Wilson, chief executive of Booker, suggested that local shops needed to plan to win back tobacco sales, particularly if supermarkets are hit by a display ban in 2011. The UK multiple grocers control £5.0bn of tobacco sales, ahead of the independent sector on £4.9bn, he said. In the next two years, local shops could win back £500m.

How? By ensuring that they have the right stock, good displays and particularly by looking to catch shoppers just after pay day or when the weather was good. In the pub business, pay days and good weather create spikes in sales. With the rise in home drinking, this may also be true for shops in the impulse sector.

On the flip side, if you do not fight for the business, then you risk losing footfall and profits to the multiples. There are plenty of challenges in selling tobacco and you need to plan to tackle them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Busy street, empty shop, missed profits

True in part to my New Year resolution, I held a business meeting in an independent coffee shop today just next door to a Starbucks. The cafe was presented well and four staff were busy preparing for the lunchtime rush, at 11am. As my guests were late, I had a half hour overview of footfall on the street outside and in the restaurant. Six customers. Barely enough to form the queue in Starbucks or Pret-a-Manger just down the road. Plus one Italian girl who dropped off her CV. Some people stopped to look at the posters in the window and moved on. The owners seemed quite happy. When I left just after 1215, they were doing brisk trade. However, I have the impression that the business is not working hard enough. It could easily have managed 120 customers between 11 and 12, instead of 12. This is lost profit as the fixed overheads and staff costs are already in place. The owners are clearly busy - perhaps too busy to take time to look at the potential that their cafe has. What shou...

Three secrets of great merchandising

Look at the ceiling and top wall of this McDonalds restaurant. There is a picture of two good looking healthy people having fun and some bright primary colours. Ask yourself what is the purpose of this picture? In the latest issue of Retail Newsagent in a feature on merchandising, Andrew Knight of RI tells its independent readers that they need to think about using sharp pictures of non-packaged products linked to people consuming goods. Perhaps this has been taken to the next level by the fast food chain - that is selling the feeling of being happy and healthy rather than the products. A second, related tip from the same feature is made by most contributors - it is vital to keep windows clean and clear of clutter. "I believe that less is more," says Roli Ranger, a retailer from Ascot, Berkshire. He has posters for promotions in between the windows that are regularly updated and discreet signs in the windows. Third, a highly visible well-stocked promotion at the entranc...

Think before you delist your slowest seller

Retailers need to introduce new products to provide their shoppers with "good news" and to generate interest. But for each new product that you introduce you need to consider delisting an existing line. Easy, you might think. I will just print out the list of products in the category and take off the one with the lowest sales. However, if you do this research from the US suggest you might be wrong. What you need to consider is what sort of demand you have for each product, a white paper by Demand Tec, a US specialist software provider shows. It says that there are two kinds of sales: incremental sales, when products add to the total shopper spend and are not readily substituted by another item transferable sales, where shoppers find an alternative easily when it is not available. Using its software, it shows a category with 50 products from top seller to bottom seller. At the same time it also measures the incremental sales each product provides. The number 50 in ove...