Skip to main content

The resilience of tobacco

Higher taxes give tobacco companies the "cover to raise prices" which means the tobacco industry is in rude health, an analysis in the FT's Lex column today shows. For local shops, which depend on tobacco sales to generate footfall, this means that they do not have to rethink their strategy anytime soon.

In the US in 2009, a 25 per cent rise in cigarette prices caused consumption to fall by 8 per cent, which was "bang in line" with the impact of the 87 per cent rise in prices since 1969 (adjusted for inflation). Based on this, investment bank UBS argues that tobacco manufacturers can sustain price increases of 4 to 5 per cent a year (8 to 9 per cent for retail prices) for the next 10 years, while absorbing consumption declines of 3 to 4  per cent.

What is good news for the tobacco manufacturers may not be good news for tobacco retailers, who might read into these numbers that the former could afford to be more generous with margins. However, they also need to fight to retain shoppers.

Speaking at last week's NFRN conference, Charles Wilson, chief executive of Booker, suggested that local shops needed to plan to win back tobacco sales, particularly if supermarkets are hit by a display ban in 2011. The UK multiple grocers control £5.0bn of tobacco sales, ahead of the independent sector on £4.9bn, he said. In the next two years, local shops could win back £500m.

How? By ensuring that they have the right stock, good displays and particularly by looking to catch shoppers just after pay day or when the weather was good. In the pub business, pay days and good weather create spikes in sales. With the rise in home drinking, this may also be true for shops in the impulse sector.

On the flip side, if you do not fight for the business, then you risk losing footfall and profits to the multiples. There are plenty of challenges in selling tobacco and you need to plan to tackle them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital disruption in the UK wholesale space

“Twenty years ago I was driving boxes to the post office in my Chevy Blazer and dreaming of a forklift,” says Jeff Bezos in his most recent letter to shareholders. A blink later and he points out that the company has grown from 30,000 employees in 2010 to 230,000 now. But his ambition is the same. “We want to be a large company that’s also an invention machine. We want to combine the extraordinary customer-serving capabilities that are enabled by size with the speed of movement, nimbleness and risk-acceptance mentality that is normally associated with entrepreneurial start-ups.” Amazon is great at disruption because of its customers focus and the fact that the internet means it needs none (or very few) people between its warehouses and the shopper. The threat of Prime, its membership service, is the biggest challenge facing the UK retail market and the wholesale market by extension. It is both a direct threat and an indirect threat in that is inspiring countless numbers of othe...

Traffic lights: a fuss about nothing

I am sure that FT columnist Michael Skapinker has written about traffic lights food labelling before and his latest article is provocatively called: The food companies that make people fat. He criticises Coca-Cola and Unilever for sticking with guideline daily amounts (GDAs) when traffic lights work much better. Former Walmart Europe public affairs head Bernard Hughes wrote in to support Skapinker. He said: "There isn't ever a perfect information system flowing with beautiful logic. But traffic lights give powerful direction to the busy consumer." But in this age of smart phones surely this debate over the labelling on the packaging is easily overcome. The government can simply issue an app that when held over a bar code provides shoppers with a traffic light system. The supermarkets could do this on their websites. Surely the whole point about the future is that the internet and limitless data storage means that the shopper is being empowered with the informatio...

Sunday trading consultation: fair or fixed? You decide.

My local council, South Oxfordshire, asked me to complete a survey on Sunday trading as a local resident. The deadline is next week. The first question was about the current arrangements and what I thought. There were five options: large shops shouldn’t open six hours is already too long current restrictions are about right large shops should be allowed open for longer no restrictions. My answer was the current restrictions are about right. The next question was about what would happen if the council allowed large stores to open for longer. The menu included 10 options and a space for other. The options were that it would: encourage me to shop more in my local town give me more flexibility impact on my religious or cultural beliefs have a positive impact on my business have a negative impact on my business increase footfall to my business reduce footfall to my business provide more employment opportunities open to me in the local area mean that I need to...