Skip to main content

Why you need eyes like a hawk

FT columnist John Kay recently argued that an innovation that people want but that the banks are avoiding is a faster payment systems. In 2000, the government promised to act to make the system less slow and expensive by setting up an agency to oversee payments. A year later it backed down and proposed giving the powers to an existing agency. Two years later it set up a task force to monitor developments. Two years later it set up payments council to take over from the task force. This council was headed by the man who ran the banks' payments system and 11 of its 15 members were from banks. Lots of activity, little action. In the US, George Bush found a neat way to trim the powers of regulators overseeing the financial institutions. He cut their budgets so they could not afford to do their jobs. Local retailers hoping to persuade their politicians to support their businesses may take two things from these stories. First, getting legislators to act in favour of the little guy is difficult. Second, keeping him to his promises requires constant attention.

Comments

  1. 'This council was headed by the man who ran the banks' payments system and 11 of its 15 members were from banks. Lots of activity, little action.'

    Sounds very much like JIG!

    Steve

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.