Skip to main content

Big ban theory pushed by the Guardian


Celebrating the fifth anniversary of the ban on smoking in public places, the Guardian published a well written leader celebrating this policy as almost cost-free and that could save untold numbers of lives. This neatly encapsulates the seductive power of anti-smoking measures in the minds of MPs. The second claim - saving lives - could perhaps be better stated as prolonging lives.

Moving swiftly on, the newspaper says that it took 60 years for a "smoking ban" to be introduced. The Guardian has a reputation for grammatical errors. Perhaps this is shorthand for "smoking in public places ban".

However, it goes on to discuss how single-issue campaigns on things like seatbelts and lead-free petrol worked. Professional awareness, campaigns for public awareness, industry reaction, then finally government action.

What is next? Alcohol and obesity, the Guardian says. The government, it says, is trying to avoid taking action by passing responsibility to local government and the industry. This won't work, it says. It wants action now, not in 60 years time.

The person who wrote this never invested their own money in setting up a local business. They have no sympathy for the impact that excessive regulation makes on local shops. They are writing for the public health lobby. It exists.

What is interesting is the response that the comment generated. "So all the people warning first they'll come for your fags, then they'll come for your booze weren't wrong" starts the first one, and on it goes. Perhaps the Guardian should research its readers a little more closely. Perhaps they are not all in the public health lobby.

It is true that public health policy in the first half of the 20th century made a huge impact on the well-being of society. People who learned skills in their 20s stayed economically active until they were 65 and this benefited all society. However, extending the average lifespan of people from 70 something to 90 something, if that is what is projected is unlikely to have a similar benefit.

Local traders need to be vigilant. The risk of regulation hurting their businesses is very real.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three secrets of great merchandising

Look at the ceiling and top wall of this McDonalds restaurant. There is a picture of two good looking healthy people having fun and some bright primary colours. Ask yourself what is the purpose of this picture? In the latest issue of Retail Newsagent in a feature on merchandising, Andrew Knight of RI tells its independent readers that they need to think about using sharp pictures of non-packaged products linked to people consuming goods. Perhaps this has been taken to the next level by the fast food chain - that is selling the feeling of being happy and healthy rather than the products. A second, related tip from the same feature is made by most contributors - it is vital to keep windows clean and clear of clutter. "I believe that less is more," says Roli Ranger, a retailer from Ascot, Berkshire. He has posters for promotions in between the windows that are regularly updated and discreet signs in the windows. Third, a highly visible well-stocked promotion at the entranc
3 comments
Read more

Overcoming a price disadvantage

Planning for his speech at the Independent Achievers Academy last week, Theo Paphitis asked an assistant to buy a basket of six essentials from a Tesco, a Londis (independent operator in a symbol group) and a One Stop (Tesco's CTN/convenience chain). Tesco was cheapest by a big margin. Second came Londis. The most expensive was One Stop. Mr Paphitis understands the power of the supermarkets and he says the way to counter them is to focus on how to make the experience of shopping with you more relevant to shoppers or more enjoyable for them. John Heynan, sales director of Molson Coors, told Retail Newsagent at about the same time that occasional beer buyers will pay 13 per cent more for their beer in an independent convenience store, provided the retailer targets them appropriately. Tesco has carved itself out this 13 per cent head start. Looking at pricing, if Tesco is 100, then Tesco Express is 108, One Stop is 112, a good symbol group is 115 and non-affiliated independents
2 comments
Read more

A sign of retail stress perhaps

It must have been four months since this window was broken in the Tesco Express on Pentonville Road and I simply cannot believe that it has not been fixed. This is the sort of lack of focus that independent shops usually get criticised for. The only purpose in sharing this image is to encourage those independents with high standards who are finding the going tough that they can do better than this.
3 comments
Read more