Skip to main content

High prices, low margins: a challenge for tobacco sales

It is a Catch 22 situation. The margin on a pack of premium cigarettes sold at recommended retail price is overwhelmed by the sheer size of the government's tax take to the point where some retailers say they cannot borrow money cheaply enough to cover the cost of their stockholding.

Using a pack of Lambert and Butler as an example, Amal Pramanik, general manager of Imperial Tobacco UK, told wholesalers last week that 81 per cent of its £7.19 selling price was taken in excise duties and VAT, leaving just £1.42 to be shared out by the manufacturer and retailers. On value brands, the government was taking as much as 88 per cent of the selling price.

Well aware that retailers are criticising his company for the low margins, Mr Pramanick says that retailers should look at their margin against the net sales price after stripping out government duty. On L&B this works out at 37p, which has increased by 33 per cent over the past five years. It is a tiny 5.1 per cent margin on the price retailers are guided to sell at. But a more respectable 26 per cent on the net selling price.

The government's plans for plain packaging was an even bigger threat, Mr Pramanik told the trade. On the one hand, this would boost the illicit trade, which already accounts for a third of cigarette sales in the UK. On the other, the trends to down trade to value brands would be compounded, meaning margins would shrink further.

Asked about the impact on working capital and cashflow for retailers, Mr Pramanik said that Imperial was working out how it could help the trade. Wholesalers get, he said, very good credit terms but the retail sector struggled. Trials were taking place to find ways to help retailers overcome the cash flow problem.

Ideas around personal guarantees could be the way forward. Any ideas welcome. Let me know.

PS, If you can sell cigarettes at a 10 per cent premium to the market, you can get your L&B margin up to around 14 per cent by adding 70p to the selling price. Your shoppers may notice!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Busy street, empty shop, missed profits

True in part to my New Year resolution, I held a business meeting in an independent coffee shop today just next door to a Starbucks. The cafe was presented well and four staff were busy preparing for the lunchtime rush, at 11am. As my guests were late, I had a half hour overview of footfall on the street outside and in the restaurant. Six customers. Barely enough to form the queue in Starbucks or Pret-a-Manger just down the road. Plus one Italian girl who dropped off her CV. Some people stopped to look at the posters in the window and moved on. The owners seemed quite happy. When I left just after 1215, they were doing brisk trade. However, I have the impression that the business is not working hard enough. It could easily have managed 120 customers between 11 and 12, instead of 12. This is lost profit as the fixed overheads and staff costs are already in place. The owners are clearly busy - perhaps too busy to take time to look at the potential that their cafe has. What shou...

Think before you delist your slowest seller

Retailers need to introduce new products to provide their shoppers with "good news" and to generate interest. But for each new product that you introduce you need to consider delisting an existing line. Easy, you might think. I will just print out the list of products in the category and take off the one with the lowest sales. However, if you do this research from the US suggest you might be wrong. What you need to consider is what sort of demand you have for each product, a white paper by Demand Tec, a US specialist software provider shows. It says that there are two kinds of sales: incremental sales, when products add to the total shopper spend and are not readily substituted by another item transferable sales, where shoppers find an alternative easily when it is not available. Using its software, it shows a category with 50 products from top seller to bottom seller. At the same time it also measures the incremental sales each product provides. The number 50 in ove...

Sticks and stones do hurt

My 17 year-old son returned from a rock festival this week wearing a wristband proudly declaring him 0ver 18. He explained how easy it had been to use someone else's ID to get the identification and said it was ironic that he had not needed to show the over 18 band when buying alcohol. Today, Scottish retailer Abdul Qadar is complaining that public authorities are asking people to lie about their age when making test purchases. What trading standards officers may be forgetting is that the fact that retailers invest in a business premises and trade consistently from it make their job much, much easier. The alternative, a world of markets and itinerant traders, will be far harder to police. Mr Qadar's sense of injustice is fair. Those retailers, like Mr Qadar, who value their investment will seek to trade legally and will not sell alcohol to people under the age of 18. Asking children to lie about their age to local traders is a slander on all retailers.