Skip to main content

2010 looks like being a tough year

Andy Bond runs Asda, the UK arm of Wal-Mart, and recently agreed to a lengthy interview with the Financial Times newspaper about his views on whether he was the right man for the Marks & Spencer top job. I find it hard to believe that his US employers would be happy for him just to chew the fat with a newspaper about his career options so it was interesting to read what else he was talking about.

So when he says that 2010 will be a tough year, he must be talking to someone other than his shoppers. He notes that the 2.5% rise in VAT and other tax increases in the pipeline will be putting presure on the amount of money that households have to spend. Is it a message to suppliers that they will have to trim their prices so that Asda can cut the cost of its products to shoppers? Probably.

For many local shops, an upward nudge in January is possibly being pencilled into their business plans now. But don't assume that the multiples will make it easy for you. Think about how it will look if the major supermarkets promise to hold their prices and absorb the VAT hike on, say, the top 250 everyday lines.

2010 looks like being a tough year.

Comments

  1. Yep, 2010 is going to be a tough year and so will 2011 be also. With an election and a likely change in Government cuts will follow. That means less money in the economy. The Tax Payers Alliance and IoD are suggesting £50 Billion less.

    But your point about holding the price of 250 top everyday lines, most of those will be zero rated.

    We already plan to treat the VAT rise in the same way we treated the reduction, No Action, just let it gradually happen.

    What ASDA or Tesco will do is shout about it, so must we.

    Steve

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Steve,

    You are right about the zero-rating. I have not seen any figures about the proportion of zero-rated turnover in the mix for local shops and must look it up.

    Nick

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Busy street, empty shop, missed profits

True in part to my New Year resolution, I held a business meeting in an independent coffee shop today just next door to a Starbucks. The cafe was presented well and four staff were busy preparing for the lunchtime rush, at 11am. As my guests were late, I had a half hour overview of footfall on the street outside and in the restaurant. Six customers. Barely enough to form the queue in Starbucks or Pret-a-Manger just down the road. Plus one Italian girl who dropped off her CV. Some people stopped to look at the posters in the window and moved on. The owners seemed quite happy. When I left just after 1215, they were doing brisk trade. However, I have the impression that the business is not working hard enough. It could easily have managed 120 customers between 11 and 12, instead of 12. This is lost profit as the fixed overheads and staff costs are already in place. The owners are clearly busy - perhaps too busy to take time to look at the potential that their cafe has. What shou...

Three secrets of great merchandising

Look at the ceiling and top wall of this McDonalds restaurant. There is a picture of two good looking healthy people having fun and some bright primary colours. Ask yourself what is the purpose of this picture? In the latest issue of Retail Newsagent in a feature on merchandising, Andrew Knight of RI tells its independent readers that they need to think about using sharp pictures of non-packaged products linked to people consuming goods. Perhaps this has been taken to the next level by the fast food chain - that is selling the feeling of being happy and healthy rather than the products. A second, related tip from the same feature is made by most contributors - it is vital to keep windows clean and clear of clutter. "I believe that less is more," says Roli Ranger, a retailer from Ascot, Berkshire. He has posters for promotions in between the windows that are regularly updated and discreet signs in the windows. Third, a highly visible well-stocked promotion at the entranc...

Think before you delist your slowest seller

Retailers need to introduce new products to provide their shoppers with "good news" and to generate interest. But for each new product that you introduce you need to consider delisting an existing line. Easy, you might think. I will just print out the list of products in the category and take off the one with the lowest sales. However, if you do this research from the US suggest you might be wrong. What you need to consider is what sort of demand you have for each product, a white paper by Demand Tec, a US specialist software provider shows. It says that there are two kinds of sales: incremental sales, when products add to the total shopper spend and are not readily substituted by another item transferable sales, where shoppers find an alternative easily when it is not available. Using its software, it shows a category with 50 products from top seller to bottom seller. At the same time it also measures the incremental sales each product provides. The number 50 in ove...