Skip to main content

Let's not talk down the independent retailer

The Institute of Grocery Distribution collaborates with William Reed, the publisher of the Grocer, to count how many shops there are in the UK grocery channel each year. It is an excellent project hampered by a consistent bias against the independent retailer.

This year's figures, exclusively published through the Grocer last week, show that the numbers of independent shops in the convenience channel dropped from 35,620 to 35,430 last year, a fall of 0.5 per cent. Within their number, the number of independent shops that chose to be part of a symbol group rose by 3.6 per cent to 15,287 and the number of unaffiliated shops fell by 3.4 per cent to 20,143.

The Grocer chooses to describe this as "terminal decline" and says the multiples' growth comes at "the expense of the independents". Of course, writing a couple of hundred words to summarise a market of just under 42,000 outlets means trends have to be sketched with a broad brush.

Unfortunately, this usually means the multiples retailers get talked up at the expense of the independents. In its market analysis, the IGD projects that the convenience channel will grow strongly as the multiples open more than 1,000 new stores in the next few years.

Many independent retailers have responded to this challenge by joining symbol groups and investing in better standards. Some may well be swallowed up by the multiples. However, at present the independent sector as a whole is doing quite well in the local sector and this needs to be championed rather than dismissed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.