Skip to main content

Press Distribution Charter launched in UK

Adrian Smith, the former WHSmith News executive who has chaired the Press Distribution Forum in the UK, is a passionate promoter of the strengths of the newspaper and magazine supply chain in the UK.

In his introduction to last week's launch of the Press Distribution Charter, Mr Smith says the intention is to "help retailers to serve their customers". The charter has 80 clauses and a complaints mechanism, which builds on the previous ISSA regime.

However, while well intentioned the charter is always likely to fall short as far as retailers are concerned. The reasons for this are set out in an unrelated column by FT writer John Kay, who chose this week to discuss the weaknesses of regulation.

In 1887 the US decided to regulate its railroads at the request of farmers and merchants. However, Mr Kay quotes the president of the Union Pacific Railroad who supported regulation as saying: "What is desired is something having a good sound, but quite harmless, which will impress the popular mind with the idea that a great deal is being done, when, in reality, very little is intended to be done."

In observing this, I am not saying that the charter and the forum are planning  to do very little or that they are as cynical as the Union Pacific president. However, Mr Kay argues that "regulatory capture" means that the people who regulate industries usually come to see those industries through the eyes of its leading players - in the UK newstrade, the publishers and wholesalers.

The reason for this, he argues, is that the regulator is dependent for information on the businesses it regulates and getting that information is more likely to come from the major companies operating in the industry. As the executives in these companies are likely to believe in their business plans and to believe that how they operate is in the public interest, their information is unlikely to suggest that major change is required. The regulator is therefor likely to follow the status quo.

In the case of the US railroads, it was the supreme court and not the regulator that changed the way railroads operated.

The charter sets out some useful standards that will help retailers to know what good service should look like. It does not, however, guarantee that retailers will get excellent service. The newstrade is likely to remain too complex for that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...