Skip to main content

Lidl and the art of showmanship

There is a story in the Times today under the headline "Lidl fools the foodies with fake farmers' market test" showing that the "average person could not tell the difference between artisanal fare sold at markets and the products available on its shelves".

The company set up a farmers' market in the east end of London and filmed shoppers who bought the products and then were surprised to be told that they were sourced from Lidl.

For example, they bought mangoes at 75p and aubergines at 45p. The Times goes on to compare this with the prices at "the fashionable Borough Market" where they cost £1.99 and 70p each.

The results will be provided to us all to see in a £20 million advertising campaign next month.

This "news item" from the Times is of course not really news. It is part of the media story that portrays Lidl and Aldi as plucky little underdogs rescuing the UK consumer so that, in the words of its UK managing director Ronny Gottschlich, "there doesn't need to be a compromise between offering excellent quality and excellent value."

In the advertisement, which I have not seen, I expect the story will be set up as follows. Open with picture of a great looking farmers market with great looking products and great customer service. Reveal when man with microphone talks to happy purchaser and says would you be surprised to find that what you just bought came from Lidl. Cut to picture of happy consumer now happy to shop in environment of Lidl rather than farmers market.

The first thing to be said is that most people cannot tell the difference between product A and product B because they do not spend a lot of time thinking about what they are tasting. If you present a product as artisanal then people who want to buy it will pay more partly because of the stories they are telling themselves about what a farmers market stands for. Most people will not be able to explain what the difference between an artisanal product and a regular product might be.

The second thing is that it is generally well known that the product quality in the discounter stores is good. This is because they focus on a narrow range and sell lots of product. Most shoppers would expect a product in Lidl to be as good as a product in a farmers market, especially if it is mango or aubergine. Why not?

The most important lesson for independent retailers is that they should take lessons from the Lidl playbook. Focus on your core range. Focus on selling quality product. And present the product in a way that supports the narrative going on in your shoppers' mind.

Remember that a hard pressed mother with a limited budget is never likely to be a farmers market shopper anyway. She will be in another part of the east end at the traditional markets which will be selling the fruit and vegetables even cheaper with the quality guaranteed for 24 hours.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Three secrets of great merchandising

Look at the ceiling and top wall of this McDonalds restaurant. There is a picture of two good looking healthy people having fun and some bright primary colours. Ask yourself what is the purpose of this picture? In the latest issue of Retail Newsagent in a feature on merchandising, Andrew Knight of RI tells its independent readers that they need to think about using sharp pictures of non-packaged products linked to people consuming goods. Perhaps this has been taken to the next level by the fast food chain - that is selling the feeling of being happy and healthy rather than the products. A second, related tip from the same feature is made by most contributors - it is vital to keep windows clean and clear of clutter. "I believe that less is more," says Roli Ranger, a retailer from Ascot, Berkshire. He has posters for promotions in between the windows that are regularly updated and discreet signs in the windows. Third, a highly visible well-stocked promotion at the entranc...

Busy street, empty shop, missed profits

True in part to my New Year resolution, I held a business meeting in an independent coffee shop today just next door to a Starbucks. The cafe was presented well and four staff were busy preparing for the lunchtime rush, at 11am. As my guests were late, I had a half hour overview of footfall on the street outside and in the restaurant. Six customers. Barely enough to form the queue in Starbucks or Pret-a-Manger just down the road. Plus one Italian girl who dropped off her CV. Some people stopped to look at the posters in the window and moved on. The owners seemed quite happy. When I left just after 1215, they were doing brisk trade. However, I have the impression that the business is not working hard enough. It could easily have managed 120 customers between 11 and 12, instead of 12. This is lost profit as the fixed overheads and staff costs are already in place. The owners are clearly busy - perhaps too busy to take time to look at the potential that their cafe has. What shou...

Sticks and stones do hurt

My 17 year-old son returned from a rock festival this week wearing a wristband proudly declaring him 0ver 18. He explained how easy it had been to use someone else's ID to get the identification and said it was ironic that he had not needed to show the over 18 band when buying alcohol. Today, Scottish retailer Abdul Qadar is complaining that public authorities are asking people to lie about their age when making test purchases. What trading standards officers may be forgetting is that the fact that retailers invest in a business premises and trade consistently from it make their job much, much easier. The alternative, a world of markets and itinerant traders, will be far harder to police. Mr Qadar's sense of injustice is fair. Those retailers, like Mr Qadar, who value their investment will seek to trade legally and will not sell alcohol to people under the age of 18. Asking children to lie about their age to local traders is a slander on all retailers.