Skip to main content

Lidl and the art of showmanship

There is a story in the Times today under the headline "Lidl fools the foodies with fake farmers' market test" showing that the "average person could not tell the difference between artisanal fare sold at markets and the products available on its shelves".

The company set up a farmers' market in the east end of London and filmed shoppers who bought the products and then were surprised to be told that they were sourced from Lidl.

For example, they bought mangoes at 75p and aubergines at 45p. The Times goes on to compare this with the prices at "the fashionable Borough Market" where they cost £1.99 and 70p each.

The results will be provided to us all to see in a £20 million advertising campaign next month.

This "news item" from the Times is of course not really news. It is part of the media story that portrays Lidl and Aldi as plucky little underdogs rescuing the UK consumer so that, in the words of its UK managing director Ronny Gottschlich, "there doesn't need to be a compromise between offering excellent quality and excellent value."

In the advertisement, which I have not seen, I expect the story will be set up as follows. Open with picture of a great looking farmers market with great looking products and great customer service. Reveal when man with microphone talks to happy purchaser and says would you be surprised to find that what you just bought came from Lidl. Cut to picture of happy consumer now happy to shop in environment of Lidl rather than farmers market.

The first thing to be said is that most people cannot tell the difference between product A and product B because they do not spend a lot of time thinking about what they are tasting. If you present a product as artisanal then people who want to buy it will pay more partly because of the stories they are telling themselves about what a farmers market stands for. Most people will not be able to explain what the difference between an artisanal product and a regular product might be.

The second thing is that it is generally well known that the product quality in the discounter stores is good. This is because they focus on a narrow range and sell lots of product. Most shoppers would expect a product in Lidl to be as good as a product in a farmers market, especially if it is mango or aubergine. Why not?

The most important lesson for independent retailers is that they should take lessons from the Lidl playbook. Focus on your core range. Focus on selling quality product. And present the product in a way that supports the narrative going on in your shoppers' mind.

Remember that a hard pressed mother with a limited budget is never likely to be a farmers market shopper anyway. She will be in another part of the east end at the traditional markets which will be selling the fruit and vegetables even cheaper with the quality guaranteed for 24 hours.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...