Skip to main content

Local shops are eating into the supermarkets' margins

The City analysts cannot make up their minds as to whether the supermarkets' investment in convenience stores is a good thing or not. The FT in a Monday analysis piece suggests that "Grocers count cost of smaller outlets". It is a clever headline. Obviously they are managing their costs. But also they are measuring the impact on their bottom line.

There are several issues. If you sell 399 chicken dinners and have one left over, the cost model is very different from a shop where you sell nine chicken dinners and have one left over. If your 60,000 square foot hypermarket is sited where land is cheap and rates low, the cost of storing those dinners will be cheaper  than in a 3,000 square foot store in a city centre.

How do the grocers try to manage the costs:
1. By clustering c-stores close together so you only need one truck to do deliveries
2. By tailoring what the stores offer to local demand and getting the stock levels correct
3. By trying to persuade shoppers to buy premium products.

"If people are going to come in and buy steak and a bottle of wine, it completely changes the economics," Miles Foster, who is heading Morrisons c-store trial, told the FT. However, it is clear that the supermarkets are struggling with finding a competitive advatage against the wholesaler/cash and carry to symbol group/independent supply chain for local stores.

Independent retailers cannot be complacent but they may be encouraged. The big box approach works for superstores in part because the cost of travelling to the stores is taken by the shopper - both in time and through the cost of fuel. Moving the shop closer to the shopper means the supermarkets are taking over a bigger share of this cost and so far they can't make the sums add up.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Busy street, empty shop, missed profits

True in part to my New Year resolution, I held a business meeting in an independent coffee shop today just next door to a Starbucks. The cafe was presented well and four staff were busy preparing for the lunchtime rush, at 11am. As my guests were late, I had a half hour overview of footfall on the street outside and in the restaurant. Six customers. Barely enough to form the queue in Starbucks or Pret-a-Manger just down the road. Plus one Italian girl who dropped off her CV. Some people stopped to look at the posters in the window and moved on. The owners seemed quite happy. When I left just after 1215, they were doing brisk trade. However, I have the impression that the business is not working hard enough. It could easily have managed 120 customers between 11 and 12, instead of 12. This is lost profit as the fixed overheads and staff costs are already in place. The owners are clearly busy - perhaps too busy to take time to look at the potential that their cafe has. What shou...

Three secrets of great merchandising

Look at the ceiling and top wall of this McDonalds restaurant. There is a picture of two good looking healthy people having fun and some bright primary colours. Ask yourself what is the purpose of this picture? In the latest issue of Retail Newsagent in a feature on merchandising, Andrew Knight of RI tells its independent readers that they need to think about using sharp pictures of non-packaged products linked to people consuming goods. Perhaps this has been taken to the next level by the fast food chain - that is selling the feeling of being happy and healthy rather than the products. A second, related tip from the same feature is made by most contributors - it is vital to keep windows clean and clear of clutter. "I believe that less is more," says Roli Ranger, a retailer from Ascot, Berkshire. He has posters for promotions in between the windows that are regularly updated and discreet signs in the windows. Third, a highly visible well-stocked promotion at the entranc...

Think before you delist your slowest seller

Retailers need to introduce new products to provide their shoppers with "good news" and to generate interest. But for each new product that you introduce you need to consider delisting an existing line. Easy, you might think. I will just print out the list of products in the category and take off the one with the lowest sales. However, if you do this research from the US suggest you might be wrong. What you need to consider is what sort of demand you have for each product, a white paper by Demand Tec, a US specialist software provider shows. It says that there are two kinds of sales: incremental sales, when products add to the total shopper spend and are not readily substituted by another item transferable sales, where shoppers find an alternative easily when it is not available. Using its software, it shows a category with 50 products from top seller to bottom seller. At the same time it also measures the incremental sales each product provides. The number 50 in ove...