Skip to main content

Local shops are eating into the supermarkets' margins

The City analysts cannot make up their minds as to whether the supermarkets' investment in convenience stores is a good thing or not. The FT in a Monday analysis piece suggests that "Grocers count cost of smaller outlets". It is a clever headline. Obviously they are managing their costs. But also they are measuring the impact on their bottom line.

There are several issues. If you sell 399 chicken dinners and have one left over, the cost model is very different from a shop where you sell nine chicken dinners and have one left over. If your 60,000 square foot hypermarket is sited where land is cheap and rates low, the cost of storing those dinners will be cheaper  than in a 3,000 square foot store in a city centre.

How do the grocers try to manage the costs:
1. By clustering c-stores close together so you only need one truck to do deliveries
2. By tailoring what the stores offer to local demand and getting the stock levels correct
3. By trying to persuade shoppers to buy premium products.

"If people are going to come in and buy steak and a bottle of wine, it completely changes the economics," Miles Foster, who is heading Morrisons c-store trial, told the FT. However, it is clear that the supermarkets are struggling with finding a competitive advatage against the wholesaler/cash and carry to symbol group/independent supply chain for local stores.

Independent retailers cannot be complacent but they may be encouraged. The big box approach works for superstores in part because the cost of travelling to the stores is taken by the shopper - both in time and through the cost of fuel. Moving the shop closer to the shopper means the supermarkets are taking over a bigger share of this cost and so far they can't make the sums add up.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.