Skip to main content

Local shops are eating into the supermarkets' margins

The City analysts cannot make up their minds as to whether the supermarkets' investment in convenience stores is a good thing or not. The FT in a Monday analysis piece suggests that "Grocers count cost of smaller outlets". It is a clever headline. Obviously they are managing their costs. But also they are measuring the impact on their bottom line.

There are several issues. If you sell 399 chicken dinners and have one left over, the cost model is very different from a shop where you sell nine chicken dinners and have one left over. If your 60,000 square foot hypermarket is sited where land is cheap and rates low, the cost of storing those dinners will be cheaper  than in a 3,000 square foot store in a city centre.

How do the grocers try to manage the costs:
1. By clustering c-stores close together so you only need one truck to do deliveries
2. By tailoring what the stores offer to local demand and getting the stock levels correct
3. By trying to persuade shoppers to buy premium products.

"If people are going to come in and buy steak and a bottle of wine, it completely changes the economics," Miles Foster, who is heading Morrisons c-store trial, told the FT. However, it is clear that the supermarkets are struggling with finding a competitive advatage against the wholesaler/cash and carry to symbol group/independent supply chain for local stores.

Independent retailers cannot be complacent but they may be encouraged. The big box approach works for superstores in part because the cost of travelling to the stores is taken by the shopper - both in time and through the cost of fuel. Moving the shop closer to the shopper means the supermarkets are taking over a bigger share of this cost and so far they can't make the sums add up.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital disruption in the UK wholesale space

“Twenty years ago I was driving boxes to the post office in my Chevy Blazer and dreaming of a forklift,” says Jeff Bezos in his most recent letter to shareholders. A blink later and he points out that the company has grown from 30,000 employees in 2010 to 230,000 now. But his ambition is the same. “We want to be a large company that’s also an invention machine. We want to combine the extraordinary customer-serving capabilities that are enabled by size with the speed of movement, nimbleness and risk-acceptance mentality that is normally associated with entrepreneurial start-ups.” Amazon is great at disruption because of its customers focus and the fact that the internet means it needs none (or very few) people between its warehouses and the shopper. The threat of Prime, its membership service, is the biggest challenge facing the UK retail market and the wholesale market by extension. It is both a direct threat and an indirect threat in that is inspiring countless numbers of othe...

Traffic lights: a fuss about nothing

I am sure that FT columnist Michael Skapinker has written about traffic lights food labelling before and his latest article is provocatively called: The food companies that make people fat. He criticises Coca-Cola and Unilever for sticking with guideline daily amounts (GDAs) when traffic lights work much better. Former Walmart Europe public affairs head Bernard Hughes wrote in to support Skapinker. He said: "There isn't ever a perfect information system flowing with beautiful logic. But traffic lights give powerful direction to the busy consumer." But in this age of smart phones surely this debate over the labelling on the packaging is easily overcome. The government can simply issue an app that when held over a bar code provides shoppers with a traffic light system. The supermarkets could do this on their websites. Surely the whole point about the future is that the internet and limitless data storage means that the shopper is being empowered with the informatio...

Sunday trading consultation: fair or fixed? You decide.

My local council, South Oxfordshire, asked me to complete a survey on Sunday trading as a local resident. The deadline is next week. The first question was about the current arrangements and what I thought. There were five options: large shops shouldn’t open six hours is already too long current restrictions are about right large shops should be allowed open for longer no restrictions. My answer was the current restrictions are about right. The next question was about what would happen if the council allowed large stores to open for longer. The menu included 10 options and a space for other. The options were that it would: encourage me to shop more in my local town give me more flexibility impact on my religious or cultural beliefs have a positive impact on my business have a negative impact on my business increase footfall to my business reduce footfall to my business provide more employment opportunities open to me in the local area mean that I need to...