Skip to main content

Spending constraints and local shops

Local retailers will be thinking hard about the impact of the government spending review announced last week. The first thing to note is that the government is not cutting spending at all.

In fact, as economist Roger Martin-Fagg points out, spending will continue to increase by 5 per cent over the next four years.

What may happen, if the economy grows, is that the proportion of the economy that is accounted for by government spending will contract from 47 per cent today to a level of 40 per cent at the same time. For the purpose of comparison, spending was at 37 per cent in 1997 when Labour came to power.

According to Mr Martin-Fagg, the current plans will cut spending in around 6 million houses with mortgages by £500 a year over the next four years.

On the other hand, if the government did not constrain spending, interest rates would need to rise by 1.5 per cent and that would cost the same householders £900 a year – nearly twice as much.

On this simple measure, the spending review must be good news for local shops.

But what will the big chains do? Retail expert and former Asda general manager Joe Cushnan says they are going to get more aggressive with their offers, carefully targeting specific activites or groups of people who they think have money to spend. They will tighten costs, affecting service standards and morale, he says. At the same time, he says they will look to sneak price rises through.

While Mr Cushnan says smaller retailers will feel the squeeze, there are two things you can do. Watch the multiples closely to see who they are targeting and make these people a better offer. Secondly, back your staff and service levels to demonstrate a point of difference.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...