Skip to main content

Milk: an Indian success story

There are many ideas in Verghese Kurien’s autobiography I Too Had a Dream that will stir the minds of independent retailers. His is the story of how the little guy wins. Of how to work with markets to win success. Of the importance of marketing. And how to leverage advantage from your connections.

Dr Kurien's achievements are remarkable. How he developed the Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation in a sleepy rural town 350 miles north of Mumbai, India has lessons for independent operators in the UK today.

The town Anand started supplying milk to Mumbai in the 1940s after a milk scare. An enterprising businessman Pestonjee Edulji, who owned the Polson butter factory in Anand, persuaded the British to give him the rights to supply milk to the city.

Armed with the sole distribution rights, Pestonjee first created big demand for Anand milk and second exploited the farmers who produced it. The British were happy with the better milk supplies and Pestonjee became very wealthy.

However Anand is in Gujarat, the home state of Mohandas Gandhi. Gandhi's right hand man Sardar Patel encouraged the farmers to work together to get a fair deal. By coincidence the Indian government sent the young Dr Kurien to work with the co-operative and he provided the leadership to make them successful.

In 1946 the co-operative asked the commissioner of the Bombay milk scheme to accept milk direct from them. The commissioner said no. The farmers went on strike and poured all their milk away. For two weeks, Polson could get no milk and its agreement with the Bombay milk commissioner collapsed. Over the next 18 years, the co-operative competed with Polson and won.

“We had one clear advantage in that unlike private companies impatient to make profits we were very patient,” says Dr Kurien.

He organised all the local milk co-operatives together and created a marketing organisation so they could sell effectively and he created a brand Amul that today is the market leader in India.

“One of the earliest lessons I had learnt was that Amul existed because barely a few hundred kilometres away Bombay existed. There could be production here only because a market was there.” While the Bombay milk scheme had exploited the farmers, it had also created the market opportunity for them.

When they started selling butter under the Amul name they found it hard to reach the market as it was controlled by Anchor butter from New Zealand and Polson’s products. So Dr Kurien lobbied the Indian government to cut the import of butter, which it did. This created an opening for Amul butter to achieve distribution.

Unlike private suppliers, who watered down products, Amul always delivered quality. Its butter was purer than the competition but users were accustomed to the Polson taste. So Amul had to get the colour and taste and salt levels correct. Giving the “customer quality products” was the value that meant when its advertising grabbed attention, consumers liked what they bought.

After this success the Indian government, which was of a socialist bent, asked Dr Kurien to introduce the co-operative model to other parts of India. What he found was the vested interests in other Indian states made it hard to reproduce his successful business model.

Perhaps his greatest success was leading the National Dairy Development Board. He came up with a plan to use surplus food from Europe to rebalance the milk market in India so that local suppliers could compete with multinationals and to increase milk production. From the 1970s to the 1990s India moved from a position where it was an importer of milk to becoming the largest milk producer in the world. In 30 years the NDDB plan doubled the milk available per person and made dairy farming successful.

Dr Kurien helped the small farmer win because he encouraged them to:
·        Equip themselves with the latest technology
·        Set themselves world class standards
·        Put in place systems that ensured they consistently achieved high standards.

His life story is inspiring and worth a place on your business book shelf.
For more see www.betterretailing.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Busy street, empty shop, missed profits

True in part to my New Year resolution, I held a business meeting in an independent coffee shop today just next door to a Starbucks. The cafe was presented well and four staff were busy preparing for the lunchtime rush, at 11am. As my guests were late, I had a half hour overview of footfall on the street outside and in the restaurant. Six customers. Barely enough to form the queue in Starbucks or Pret-a-Manger just down the road. Plus one Italian girl who dropped off her CV. Some people stopped to look at the posters in the window and moved on. The owners seemed quite happy. When I left just after 1215, they were doing brisk trade. However, I have the impression that the business is not working hard enough. It could easily have managed 120 customers between 11 and 12, instead of 12. This is lost profit as the fixed overheads and staff costs are already in place. The owners are clearly busy - perhaps too busy to take time to look at the potential that their cafe has. What shou...

Sticks and stones do hurt

My 17 year-old son returned from a rock festival this week wearing a wristband proudly declaring him 0ver 18. He explained how easy it had been to use someone else's ID to get the identification and said it was ironic that he had not needed to show the over 18 band when buying alcohol. Today, Scottish retailer Abdul Qadar is complaining that public authorities are asking people to lie about their age when making test purchases. What trading standards officers may be forgetting is that the fact that retailers invest in a business premises and trade consistently from it make their job much, much easier. The alternative, a world of markets and itinerant traders, will be far harder to police. Mr Qadar's sense of injustice is fair. Those retailers, like Mr Qadar, who value their investment will seek to trade legally and will not sell alcohol to people under the age of 18. Asking children to lie about their age to local traders is a slander on all retailers.

Think before you delist your slowest seller

Retailers need to introduce new products to provide their shoppers with "good news" and to generate interest. But for each new product that you introduce you need to consider delisting an existing line. Easy, you might think. I will just print out the list of products in the category and take off the one with the lowest sales. However, if you do this research from the US suggest you might be wrong. What you need to consider is what sort of demand you have for each product, a white paper by Demand Tec, a US specialist software provider shows. It says that there are two kinds of sales: incremental sales, when products add to the total shopper spend and are not readily substituted by another item transferable sales, where shoppers find an alternative easily when it is not available. Using its software, it shows a category with 50 products from top seller to bottom seller. At the same time it also measures the incremental sales each product provides. The number 50 in ove...