Paul
Fifield and John Greenhough respond brilliantly in a letter to the FT on the
subject of the “serial adultery of the modern consumer” as analysed by the FT’s
Andrew Hill.
The
alternative thinkers offer four thoughts about assumptions that we all have and
which may be wrong.
·
People do want relationships but generally with people rather than
organisations.
·
Value is too often confused with low prices or discounting. “In
most markets only a small percentage of customers make their decision on price
alone.”
·
Customer fickleness may not be a bad thing. It is natural for
customers to change their preferences.
·
How loyalty is measured. Typically customers who spend more than
50% of their grocery budget at a particular supermarket indicates loyalty. But
Fifield and Greenhough’s research shows that “this might indicate inertia”.
That
last finding is worth thinking about. Are your shoppers loyal to you or is the
effort of switching simply not on their minds. In which case, you don’t want to
ask customers to think about change.
For
more, go to www.betterretailing.com.
Comments
Post a Comment