Skip to main content

Sometimes your gut feel is right, sometimes it is not: how to choose

Malcolm Gladwell says he was prompted to write Blink because he grew his hair long and found as a result that he was being stopped by the police more.

“It used to be cut very short and conservatively. But I decided on a whim to let it grow wild as it had been when I was a teenager. Immediately in very small but significant ways my life changed. I started getting speeding tickets. I started getting pulled out of airport security lines. And one day as I was walking in downtown Manhattan a police van pulled up on the sidewalk and three officers jumped out. They were looking for a rapist and the rapist, they said, looked a lot like me.

“They pulled out the sketch and the description. I looked at it and pointed out to them that the rapist looked nothing at all like me. He was much taller and much heavier and about 15 years younger. All we had in common was a large head of curly hair. After 20 minutes or so the officers finally agreed with me and let me go.”

A master story teller, Gladwell turned this pavement encounter into an engaging book on how people make a decision in the blink of an eye. Other African-Americans suffered far worse, he noted. In Illinois, a black person in court for a drugs offence has a 57 times greater chance of being jailed than a white person. And in the case of Amadou Diallo, out taking a midnight breath of air by his front door, being gunned to death by four passing coppers.

Gladwell uses these tales to illustrate his point: That sometimes people make good decisions in an instance and sometimes they make bad decisions.

For an independent retailer Gladwell provides at least two great ideas that could help you operate better. The first is that too much information leads to poor decision making. The second is that people often say they don’t like innovation simply because they don’t understand it.

The first point is underscored by lessons from the US military and from Cook County hospital, the model for the TV show ER. A retired US general Paul Van Riper was hired by the Pentagon to play a rogue middle eastern enemy in a $250million war game held in August 2002. The good guys had analysed every single thing that Van Riper could do. But he still surprised them and sank 16 American warships in the Persian Gulf. The good guys pulled the plug on the game, refloated their ships and proceeded to win.

The head of Cook County hospital used an algorithm based on four measures to determine if patients were having heart attacks or not. Doctors were used to asking if people smoked, were overweight and exercised and so on. But this extra information made their decisions less accurate.

Similarly, if you are managing 4000 SKUs then you may be better off with less information and not more.

The good thing about Gladwell’s books is they get you to think about how the world works and how people work. Essential stuff if you want to be a great retailer. Blink is perfect for the impulse retailer. Read and enjoy.











Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Three secrets of great merchandising

Look at the ceiling and top wall of this McDonalds restaurant. There is a picture of two good looking healthy people having fun and some bright primary colours. Ask yourself what is the purpose of this picture? In the latest issue of Retail Newsagent in a feature on merchandising, Andrew Knight of RI tells its independent readers that they need to think about using sharp pictures of non-packaged products linked to people consuming goods. Perhaps this has been taken to the next level by the fast food chain - that is selling the feeling of being happy and healthy rather than the products. A second, related tip from the same feature is made by most contributors - it is vital to keep windows clean and clear of clutter. "I believe that less is more," says Roli Ranger, a retailer from Ascot, Berkshire. He has posters for promotions in between the windows that are regularly updated and discreet signs in the windows. Third, a highly visible well-stocked promotion at the entranc...

Busy street, empty shop, missed profits

True in part to my New Year resolution, I held a business meeting in an independent coffee shop today just next door to a Starbucks. The cafe was presented well and four staff were busy preparing for the lunchtime rush, at 11am. As my guests were late, I had a half hour overview of footfall on the street outside and in the restaurant. Six customers. Barely enough to form the queue in Starbucks or Pret-a-Manger just down the road. Plus one Italian girl who dropped off her CV. Some people stopped to look at the posters in the window and moved on. The owners seemed quite happy. When I left just after 1215, they were doing brisk trade. However, I have the impression that the business is not working hard enough. It could easily have managed 120 customers between 11 and 12, instead of 12. This is lost profit as the fixed overheads and staff costs are already in place. The owners are clearly busy - perhaps too busy to take time to look at the potential that their cafe has. What shou...

Sticks and stones do hurt

My 17 year-old son returned from a rock festival this week wearing a wristband proudly declaring him 0ver 18. He explained how easy it had been to use someone else's ID to get the identification and said it was ironic that he had not needed to show the over 18 band when buying alcohol. Today, Scottish retailer Abdul Qadar is complaining that public authorities are asking people to lie about their age when making test purchases. What trading standards officers may be forgetting is that the fact that retailers invest in a business premises and trade consistently from it make their job much, much easier. The alternative, a world of markets and itinerant traders, will be far harder to police. Mr Qadar's sense of injustice is fair. Those retailers, like Mr Qadar, who value their investment will seek to trade legally and will not sell alcohol to people under the age of 18. Asking children to lie about their age to local traders is a slander on all retailers.