Skip to main content

What I wrote to the Department of Health

This is the content of my letter that I sent last week to the civil servants asking for feedback on their ideas for tobacco packaging changes in the UK.


9 August 2012


Retaining the status quo on tobacco packaging is the best option for effective long term tobacco control in the UK

Dear Sirs

My company specialises in energising independent retailers in the news and convenience market in the UK.

These local businesses rely heavily on tobacco to generate footfall and for cash flow and profit purposes. They generally comply with tobacco legislation and make very low profits out of handling tobacco products responsibly.

Most retailers share your desire to improve public health and they comply with regulation on the sale of tobacco. This is time consuming but there is widespread consumer desire to buy tobacco products and most local retailers want to meet this demand rather than send shoppers elsewhere.

Small shopkeepers have lots of rules and regulations to follow as they sell a very wide range of products and services. They need less red tape, not more.

Introducing standardised packaging would put the responsible legal supply chain at risk. The worse you make tobacco look in store, the more attractive you will make illegal supply alternatives.

The UK’s many measures to discourage young people from taking up smoking, to encourage people to give up smoking and to reduce people’s exposure to smoke from tobacco products are underpinned by the responsible retailing of tobacco by independent shopkeepers.

The more that you denormalise sales through the legitimate retail channel, the more attractive you make the illegal trade. There is also a serious risk that more entry-level retailers will be encouraged to break the rules in order to survive against intense competition.

Independent shopkeepers already have difficult jobs to do. They have put their own and their families capital at risk and are open to widespread competition. Their efforts support the successful tobacco control policies that you have introduced. Weakening this channel will weaken future tobacco control.

Please keep the status quo. If you would like any more detailed information, please get in touch.

Yours sincerely

Nick Shanagher
Managing Director

 About my interest in this consultation:

Tobacco companies are important customers of my company and account for around 12.5 per cent of our turnover. This is lower than the percentage of turnover accounted for by tobacco sales in independent shops.

Tobacco companies spend money in our trade media to encourage retailers to stock their brands, to trade responsibly and to comply with tobacco regulations.

My company is owned by the retail membership of the National Federation of Retail Newsagents (NFRN) through a Benefits Fund. We operate commercially and editorially separately to the NFRN – but we share a mission to promote the interests of independent retailers.

Retail Express, our trade newspaper, is delivered to more than 49,000 retailers in the UK every fortnight. Retail Newsagent, our trade magazine, is bought by 13,000 retailers every week. We run events that bring suppliers and retailers together, including the Independent Achievers Academy. We have a web site, betterretailing.com, which is targeted at independent retailers.

From this activity we are in constant contact with independent retailers. Broadly the market segments into three: with expert retailers, emerging retailers and entry-level retailers. We work with suppliers to help retailers rise through the levels, encouraging and advising them to follow best practise so that they can compete with the supermarket multiples. We encourage them to retail responsibly and to comply with all regulations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...