Skip to main content

Get caught for doing something good.

A friend who worked for a large UK homewares retailer was saying that the company regularly kept a line of sofas on display priced at £1,000 for two months a year solely so they could sell the sofa at a sale price of £500 for the other 10 months.

The twist to her story was describing what happened when a company-employed mystery shopper came in and enquired about the sofa when it was at the higher price point and was told by a member of staff that if they waited two weeks they may find that it was in the sale.

Afterwards, the company criticised its team at the store for their behaviour, saying they should not have drawn the lower price available two weeks away to the "customer's" attention.

On Tuesday, the banks in England agreed to stop charging holidaymakers who pay for foreign currency with their debit cards a 2.5 per cent fee for essentially using their own cash. Foreign currency providers also agreed to better market "0 per cent" deals that are not free.

This reminded me that I had paid for some currency at an airport in September and used my debit card. Previously I had always taken the cash out a cashpoint and paid that way (possibly because I had read some advice to do it this way) but this time I used a debit card as the cashier told me there would be no charge. He did not advise me that the best thing to do was to use the cashpoint machine right next to his desk.

What connects these two stories is the way that marketing compromises the retailer's relationship with the customer and with their staff. There is nothing wrong with being creative in how you price goods and clever pricing helps many shoppers understand the value they can receive from products and services. But the best retailers always get caught trying to find the best deal for their shoppers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital disruption in the UK wholesale space

“Twenty years ago I was driving boxes to the post office in my Chevy Blazer and dreaming of a forklift,” says Jeff Bezos in his most recent letter to shareholders. A blink later and he points out that the company has grown from 30,000 employees in 2010 to 230,000 now. But his ambition is the same. “We want to be a large company that’s also an invention machine. We want to combine the extraordinary customer-serving capabilities that are enabled by size with the speed of movement, nimbleness and risk-acceptance mentality that is normally associated with entrepreneurial start-ups.” Amazon is great at disruption because of its customers focus and the fact that the internet means it needs none (or very few) people between its warehouses and the shopper. The threat of Prime, its membership service, is the biggest challenge facing the UK retail market and the wholesale market by extension. It is both a direct threat and an indirect threat in that is inspiring countless numbers of othe...

Traffic lights: a fuss about nothing

I am sure that FT columnist Michael Skapinker has written about traffic lights food labelling before and his latest article is provocatively called: The food companies that make people fat. He criticises Coca-Cola and Unilever for sticking with guideline daily amounts (GDAs) when traffic lights work much better. Former Walmart Europe public affairs head Bernard Hughes wrote in to support Skapinker. He said: "There isn't ever a perfect information system flowing with beautiful logic. But traffic lights give powerful direction to the busy consumer." But in this age of smart phones surely this debate over the labelling on the packaging is easily overcome. The government can simply issue an app that when held over a bar code provides shoppers with a traffic light system. The supermarkets could do this on their websites. Surely the whole point about the future is that the internet and limitless data storage means that the shopper is being empowered with the informatio...

Sunday trading consultation: fair or fixed? You decide.

My local council, South Oxfordshire, asked me to complete a survey on Sunday trading as a local resident. The deadline is next week. The first question was about the current arrangements and what I thought. There were five options: large shops shouldn’t open six hours is already too long current restrictions are about right large shops should be allowed open for longer no restrictions. My answer was the current restrictions are about right. The next question was about what would happen if the council allowed large stores to open for longer. The menu included 10 options and a space for other. The options were that it would: encourage me to shop more in my local town give me more flexibility impact on my religious or cultural beliefs have a positive impact on my business have a negative impact on my business increase footfall to my business reduce footfall to my business provide more employment opportunities open to me in the local area mean that I need to...