Skip to main content

Half the products on my shelves are making money...

There is a scene towards the end of the Hurt Locker where the hero (or antihero) is back home in the US from his job defusing bombs in Iraq and he is standing in a massive supermarket shed dwarfed by thousands of packs of cereal boxes and unable to make up his mind which one he wants to buy. The outcome, he goes back to work in Afghanistan risking his life solving tricky wiring problems.

Perhaps sadly for me, I was more worried about the poor quality of the product display. It was obviously not a real store - there was no attempt at point of sale, no differentiation. Perhaps the hero could have used his decision making skills to inject a bit of order into the cereal display?

However, some manufacturers may be there ahead of him. The FT says Unilever has cuts 40 per cent of its stock keeping units in the UK, armed with the view that 95 per cent of net revenues are generated by 60 per cent of SKUs. This statistical analysis from the Boston Consulting Group appears to be similar to the famous maxim of John Wanamaker that half the money he spent on advertising was wasted but he did not know which half.

But before we can agree to cut SKUs, Bob McDonald of Procter & Gamble is quoted as saying that the shopper who wants just three variants of toothpast might still want 10 different kinds of dog food.

After several thousand words on the subject, I can't work out if cutting SKUs is a good idea or not. The FT summarises this in a bullet point: "Do not rest. Reducing complexity is like painting the Forth rail bridge. It is not a one-off".

The FT in its analysis of big packaged goods companies has a different outlook to the local shop operator. However, the decisions of these packaged goods companies determines what is available for your shelves and your shoppers. There are two simple questions you should ask of every SKU.:
  1. what is it for?
  2. who is going to buy it?
How often you do this should be prioritised by profit analysis. Get your top profit generators correct first.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.