Skip to main content

A defence of Happy Meals!

The chief executive of McDonald's, Jim Skinner, clearly knows why his customers love his company's restaurants and last week attacked US regulators keen to ban children's meals as undermining parents. This follows a decision in San Francisco to ban the sale of toys with food that did not meet limits on calories, sugar and fat.

He told the FT: "We'll continue to sell Happy Meals. We've seen many years of someone trying to dictate behaviour through legislation. Our Happy Meals have been supported by parents since the 1970s. The nutrition of Happy Meals meets FDA guidelines."

For UK local retailers, and their suppliers, this is significant in that most traders fear that the willingness of politicians to legislate to improve the health of the population is out of proportion with the success of many measures. MPs that I have spoken to clearly disagree. They say that the smoking ban is a fantastic success. While they are nervous at the impact on local shops of tobacco measures, these kinds of initiatives still appeal.

For a company like McDonald's to feel confident in taking on the "food police" as Mr Skinner labelled the special interest groups must be good news for small retailers. Think about the lobbying that small retailers are doing on the tobacco display ban and the lack of public comment by the major sellers of tobacco products, including Tesco! Big corporations don't want to be caught in a backlash.

However, Mr Skinner appears to believe he knows why people buy from him: Happy Meals have been working for my customers for 40 years and they still love the format. Shoppers will vote with their wallets. You need to build up a similar story based on your shoppers and use this to provide stories to the local media and local regulators. One thing that will make an MP pause is the concern that he might do something that will be unpopular with a significant number of local voters.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital disruption in the UK wholesale space

“Twenty years ago I was driving boxes to the post office in my Chevy Blazer and dreaming of a forklift,” says Jeff Bezos in his most recent letter to shareholders. A blink later and he points out that the company has grown from 30,000 employees in 2010 to 230,000 now. But his ambition is the same. “We want to be a large company that’s also an invention machine. We want to combine the extraordinary customer-serving capabilities that are enabled by size with the speed of movement, nimbleness and risk-acceptance mentality that is normally associated with entrepreneurial start-ups.” Amazon is great at disruption because of its customers focus and the fact that the internet means it needs none (or very few) people between its warehouses and the shopper. The threat of Prime, its membership service, is the biggest challenge facing the UK retail market and the wholesale market by extension. It is both a direct threat and an indirect threat in that is inspiring countless numbers of othe...

Traffic lights: a fuss about nothing

I am sure that FT columnist Michael Skapinker has written about traffic lights food labelling before and his latest article is provocatively called: The food companies that make people fat. He criticises Coca-Cola and Unilever for sticking with guideline daily amounts (GDAs) when traffic lights work much better. Former Walmart Europe public affairs head Bernard Hughes wrote in to support Skapinker. He said: "There isn't ever a perfect information system flowing with beautiful logic. But traffic lights give powerful direction to the busy consumer." But in this age of smart phones surely this debate over the labelling on the packaging is easily overcome. The government can simply issue an app that when held over a bar code provides shoppers with a traffic light system. The supermarkets could do this on their websites. Surely the whole point about the future is that the internet and limitless data storage means that the shopper is being empowered with the informatio...

Sunday trading consultation: fair or fixed? You decide.

My local council, South Oxfordshire, asked me to complete a survey on Sunday trading as a local resident. The deadline is next week. The first question was about the current arrangements and what I thought. There were five options: large shops shouldn’t open six hours is already too long current restrictions are about right large shops should be allowed open for longer no restrictions. My answer was the current restrictions are about right. The next question was about what would happen if the council allowed large stores to open for longer. The menu included 10 options and a space for other. The options were that it would: encourage me to shop more in my local town give me more flexibility impact on my religious or cultural beliefs have a positive impact on my business have a negative impact on my business increase footfall to my business reduce footfall to my business provide more employment opportunities open to me in the local area mean that I need to...