Skip to main content

Should suppliers spend more with independents?

Suppliers are spending more and more money on trade promotions and the more they spend the more it seems they complain about compliance, which is when they measure how good retailers are at delivering the promotion the supplier has paid for.

Mostly, suppliers assume that multiple retailers are better at compliance than independent retailers, which means that local shops lose money from the start. But this is a notoriously subjective area and few suppliers share their data with their trade partners.

This makes a new survey from the USA quite interesting. AMR asked suppliers to rate how good retailers were at compliance on a scale where 1 = poor performance and 10 = good performance. The grocery channel rated OK, with a best score of 6.1 on price promotions and a worst score of 2.3 on cross-category promotins (like meal deals!).

According to AMR, the most money has been wasted on special events, where difficult to execute promotions (including floor displays and customised products) snagged in part because they added complexity to the supply chain.

For local retailers who want to take part, there is an opportunity if they can work with their key suppliers (buying groups and/or wholesalers) to develop specific promotional opportunities around known shopper behaviour. The first step is to discuss with your business development executive what information they hold or need to hold in order to sell a promotion for your shop.

It is partly about scale, which means that you need other local shopkeepers to be like-minded. It is also about being realistic. Until the independent channel builds a track record, it is still likely to trade in the shadow of the multiples. But you can take encouragement from the fact that the multiples still score so poorly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...