Skip to main content

Listening to Procter & Gamble

Like arch-rival Unilever the previous week, Procter & Gamble told investors that consumers had accepted the range of price increases that it had introduced because of the rising costs of raw materials. In summary, its results for the fourth quarter included 8 per cent sales growth of which 3 per cent was from price rises.

In a conference call to chief executive Bob McDonald, one analyst asked about how the company might respond to a low single digit growth environment in developed countries [like the UK]. He said they had two strategies. One was to keep on investing in research and development and to develop new categories. The other, if no growth was possible, was to keep its costs under control so that it hit its profit targets.

What is clear is only two areas are not under threat of spending cuts - research and development, and advertising.

One of Mr McDonald's concerns is if competitors do not raise prices. They were watching markets closely to see if they had to respond. In razors and blades, for example, competitors were spending more than ever on price promotions and discounts.

Memorably, he said: "We believe innovation wins decades and promotions affect quarters."

For local shops there is plenty to think about in what Procter & Gamble is saying, which can be summed up as stick to your strengths and plan long term. Mr McDonald believes totally in the P&G vision of helping consumers have better lives. If you believe the same about what you are doing for local shoppers and make sure all your activity links to this, then you will be in a good long term position.

Also of interest, even if something of an aside, is his assertion that P&G's sponsorship of the Olympics was expected to deliver the highest rate of return of any marketing activity ever. How this is measured I do not know but as they are thanking mums in all the countries in the world for nuturing the talent taking part, I guess it helps P&G spread into new markets.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital disruption in the UK wholesale space

“Twenty years ago I was driving boxes to the post office in my Chevy Blazer and dreaming of a forklift,” says Jeff Bezos in his most recent letter to shareholders. A blink later and he points out that the company has grown from 30,000 employees in 2010 to 230,000 now. But his ambition is the same. “We want to be a large company that’s also an invention machine. We want to combine the extraordinary customer-serving capabilities that are enabled by size with the speed of movement, nimbleness and risk-acceptance mentality that is normally associated with entrepreneurial start-ups.” Amazon is great at disruption because of its customers focus and the fact that the internet means it needs none (or very few) people between its warehouses and the shopper. The threat of Prime, its membership service, is the biggest challenge facing the UK retail market and the wholesale market by extension. It is both a direct threat and an indirect threat in that is inspiring countless numbers of othe...

Traffic lights: a fuss about nothing

I am sure that FT columnist Michael Skapinker has written about traffic lights food labelling before and his latest article is provocatively called: The food companies that make people fat. He criticises Coca-Cola and Unilever for sticking with guideline daily amounts (GDAs) when traffic lights work much better. Former Walmart Europe public affairs head Bernard Hughes wrote in to support Skapinker. He said: "There isn't ever a perfect information system flowing with beautiful logic. But traffic lights give powerful direction to the busy consumer." But in this age of smart phones surely this debate over the labelling on the packaging is easily overcome. The government can simply issue an app that when held over a bar code provides shoppers with a traffic light system. The supermarkets could do this on their websites. Surely the whole point about the future is that the internet and limitless data storage means that the shopper is being empowered with the informatio...

Sunday trading consultation: fair or fixed? You decide.

My local council, South Oxfordshire, asked me to complete a survey on Sunday trading as a local resident. The deadline is next week. The first question was about the current arrangements and what I thought. There were five options: large shops shouldn’t open six hours is already too long current restrictions are about right large shops should be allowed open for longer no restrictions. My answer was the current restrictions are about right. The next question was about what would happen if the council allowed large stores to open for longer. The menu included 10 options and a space for other. The options were that it would: encourage me to shop more in my local town give me more flexibility impact on my religious or cultural beliefs have a positive impact on my business have a negative impact on my business increase footfall to my business reduce footfall to my business provide more employment opportunities open to me in the local area mean that I need to...