Skip to main content

How best to sell magazines: a question the industry has no answer to

'We don't have it in stock but I can order it for you!' The words that are the death knell for small bookshops, according to Harry Mount, writing in the FT.

He points out that thanks to Amazon he can order it himself and the book will be delivered straight to his door. Mr Mount's article is entitled: Shed no tears for the death of the old bookshop. He is confident that book shops may survive but only if they get the emotional pitch correct. They need to provide a quiet yet communal atmosphere in which shoppers can sift through ideas.

It all sounds a bit fancy but the magazine retailer has something to learn. What Mr Mount describes is the commoditisation of buying books. In my local bookshop, when I ask for a book that they don't have, they suggest that they can order it for me. That means I must remember to come back. It also means if their wholesaler is out-of-stock then there will be more delays. I have never said yes.

But what might make me say yes? This was the question that Mr Mount does not address. I am sure that if the book shop assistant was to tell me that it was an excellent book and they wanted to read it themselves and they would love to order me a copy, then I might say yes. Instead, the look I get suggests why don't I look around and find another book, there are plenty in the shop.

What is the analogy for the magazine market. In an insight article published last year, Marketforce director Christine Lucas said that readers don't really care where they buy their magazines - just as long as they can get hold of them easily and conveniently. Ten years ago, when we organised the World of Magazines, our research showed people did care and a great many would go to WHSmith if they wanted to buy a magazine.  What can have changed? The arrival of the supermarket, which is now seen, according to Ms Lucas as the "mainstay of magazine sales".

However, her research of WHSmith shoppers suggest many do still see it as a destination for magazine purchases, with 40 per cent visiting purely to buy a magazine. What would they do if the magazine was not available? A third said they would opt for subscription copies. A quarter said they would go to a local newsagent. But more than one in 10 said they didn't know where they would go.

One problem is that selling magazines has been commoditised. By selling publications on sale or return, publishers control the supply of copy, which gives supermarkets an edge. Local retailers may not like this but think about the situation in these terms. Supermarket A says 10 million people will walk past your magazine on shelf A. Shop B says 1000 people will walk past your magazine on shelf B. Which gets your attention?

Another problem is magazine publishers don't know where to invest. Consider PPA boss Barry McIlheney's remarks as published by Retail Newsagent: "For pretty much the entire industry: headline print figure might be down a bit, website up yet again, big growth in the radio station, massive surge on the Twitter followers, ditto the Facebook page, total brand reach now into the millions."

The lack of focus could become self-fulfilling. Brain Murphy of the NFRN, also talking to Retail Newsagent, said: "The battle for retail space will not become easier because of the lack of titles, new or otherwise. It will become harder as other consumer products seize the opportunity opening before them."

As if to underline that opportunity, Retail Newsagent's slim Best Sellers update on the magazine market was preceeded by an advertisement for Clipstrips, an innovation from Pepsico so that local retailers can get crisps closer to their till points.

How will the industry respond? "The future is to continue the focus on category initiatives and to work hard on category adjacencies, display and range management in store," suggests Paul Keenan of Bauer Media. The problem, Paul, is it doesn't compare with Pepsico's promise: "Site at till points to increase slaes by up to 30 per cent."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital disruption in the UK wholesale space

“Twenty years ago I was driving boxes to the post office in my Chevy Blazer and dreaming of a forklift,” says Jeff Bezos in his most recent letter to shareholders. A blink later and he points out that the company has grown from 30,000 employees in 2010 to 230,000 now. But his ambition is the same. “We want to be a large company that’s also an invention machine. We want to combine the extraordinary customer-serving capabilities that are enabled by size with the speed of movement, nimbleness and risk-acceptance mentality that is normally associated with entrepreneurial start-ups.” Amazon is great at disruption because of its customers focus and the fact that the internet means it needs none (or very few) people between its warehouses and the shopper. The threat of Prime, its membership service, is the biggest challenge facing the UK retail market and the wholesale market by extension. It is both a direct threat and an indirect threat in that is inspiring countless numbers of othe...

Traffic lights: a fuss about nothing

I am sure that FT columnist Michael Skapinker has written about traffic lights food labelling before and his latest article is provocatively called: The food companies that make people fat. He criticises Coca-Cola and Unilever for sticking with guideline daily amounts (GDAs) when traffic lights work much better. Former Walmart Europe public affairs head Bernard Hughes wrote in to support Skapinker. He said: "There isn't ever a perfect information system flowing with beautiful logic. But traffic lights give powerful direction to the busy consumer." But in this age of smart phones surely this debate over the labelling on the packaging is easily overcome. The government can simply issue an app that when held over a bar code provides shoppers with a traffic light system. The supermarkets could do this on their websites. Surely the whole point about the future is that the internet and limitless data storage means that the shopper is being empowered with the informatio...

Think before you delist your slowest seller

Retailers need to introduce new products to provide their shoppers with "good news" and to generate interest. But for each new product that you introduce you need to consider delisting an existing line. Easy, you might think. I will just print out the list of products in the category and take off the one with the lowest sales. However, if you do this research from the US suggest you might be wrong. What you need to consider is what sort of demand you have for each product, a white paper by Demand Tec, a US specialist software provider shows. It says that there are two kinds of sales: incremental sales, when products add to the total shopper spend and are not readily substituted by another item transferable sales, where shoppers find an alternative easily when it is not available. Using its software, it shows a category with 50 products from top seller to bottom seller. At the same time it also measures the incremental sales each product provides. The number 50 in ove...