Skip to main content

Fortune's shrinking bog roll

As commodity prices rise, so manufacturers seek to cut back on the raw materials that they use...

The November 15 issue of Fortune illustrates this well with an analysis of Scott 1000 toilet paper.

In 1995, a single sheet measured 4.5 by 4.5 inches. Four years later the sheet was cut to 4.5 by 4.1 inches while its maker, Kimberly-Clark made "softness enhancements". Seven years later, more "softness enhancements" plus a pattern added and the sheet is 4.5 by 3.7 inches. This August, a "10 per cent strength product enhancement" and, you guessed it, the sheet is 4.1 by 3.7 inches.

The Cottonelle double roll reduced from 308 sheets to 260 in February. The Angel Soft Double Roll went from 352 sheets to 300 and reduced from 4.17 inches wide to 4.0 in April. Charmin Ultra Soft Big Roll dropped from 200 sheets to 176 in July. Quilted Northern Soft and Strong Double Roll went from 286 to 242 sheets in September. A year ago it went from 4.5 inches wide to 4.0.

Will shoppers notice? Will local retailers notice? Where will it end? Well done to Fortune for the research.
Labels:

Comments

  1. The Village Postmaster16 November 2010 at 17:27

    Back to the torn up bits of the News of the World on a nail in the outside lavvy.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.
Post a Comment
Read more

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.
Post a Comment
Read more

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...
Post a Comment
Read more