Skip to main content

Spending constraints and local shops

Local retailers will be thinking hard about the impact of the government spending review announced last week. The first thing to note is that the government is not cutting spending at all.

In fact, as economist Roger Martin-Fagg points out, spending will continue to increase by 5 per cent over the next four years.

What may happen, if the economy grows, is that the proportion of the economy that is accounted for by government spending will contract from 47 per cent today to a level of 40 per cent at the same time. For the purpose of comparison, spending was at 37 per cent in 1997 when Labour came to power.

According to Mr Martin-Fagg, the current plans will cut spending in around 6 million houses with mortgages by £500 a year over the next four years.

On the other hand, if the government did not constrain spending, interest rates would need to rise by 1.5 per cent and that would cost the same householders £900 a year – nearly twice as much.

On this simple measure, the spending review must be good news for local shops.

But what will the big chains do? Retail expert and former Asda general manager Joe Cushnan says they are going to get more aggressive with their offers, carefully targeting specific activites or groups of people who they think have money to spend. They will tighten costs, affecting service standards and morale, he says. At the same time, he says they will look to sneak price rises through.

While Mr Cushnan says smaller retailers will feel the squeeze, there are two things you can do. Watch the multiples closely to see who they are targeting and make these people a better offer. Secondly, back your staff and service levels to demonstrate a point of difference.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital disruption in the UK wholesale space

“Twenty years ago I was driving boxes to the post office in my Chevy Blazer and dreaming of a forklift,” says Jeff Bezos in his most recent letter to shareholders. A blink later and he points out that the company has grown from 30,000 employees in 2010 to 230,000 now. But his ambition is the same. “We want to be a large company that’s also an invention machine. We want to combine the extraordinary customer-serving capabilities that are enabled by size with the speed of movement, nimbleness and risk-acceptance mentality that is normally associated with entrepreneurial start-ups.” Amazon is great at disruption because of its customers focus and the fact that the internet means it needs none (or very few) people between its warehouses and the shopper. The threat of Prime, its membership service, is the biggest challenge facing the UK retail market and the wholesale market by extension. It is both a direct threat and an indirect threat in that is inspiring countless numbers of othe...

Traffic lights: a fuss about nothing

I am sure that FT columnist Michael Skapinker has written about traffic lights food labelling before and his latest article is provocatively called: The food companies that make people fat. He criticises Coca-Cola and Unilever for sticking with guideline daily amounts (GDAs) when traffic lights work much better. Former Walmart Europe public affairs head Bernard Hughes wrote in to support Skapinker. He said: "There isn't ever a perfect information system flowing with beautiful logic. But traffic lights give powerful direction to the busy consumer." But in this age of smart phones surely this debate over the labelling on the packaging is easily overcome. The government can simply issue an app that when held over a bar code provides shoppers with a traffic light system. The supermarkets could do this on their websites. Surely the whole point about the future is that the internet and limitless data storage means that the shopper is being empowered with the informatio...

Sunday trading consultation: fair or fixed? You decide.

My local council, South Oxfordshire, asked me to complete a survey on Sunday trading as a local resident. The deadline is next week. The first question was about the current arrangements and what I thought. There were five options: large shops shouldn’t open six hours is already too long current restrictions are about right large shops should be allowed open for longer no restrictions. My answer was the current restrictions are about right. The next question was about what would happen if the council allowed large stores to open for longer. The menu included 10 options and a space for other. The options were that it would: encourage me to shop more in my local town give me more flexibility impact on my religious or cultural beliefs have a positive impact on my business have a negative impact on my business increase footfall to my business reduce footfall to my business provide more employment opportunities open to me in the local area mean that I need to...