Skip to main content

Less sugar, less salt, more sales?

Regulation is a big threat to business success and because treats are a major part of most local shops' sales regulation means politicians want a say in how your business works. In response, you need to influence as many politicians as possible and that means you need to take part in trade associations to get your message across.

Last week, PepsiCo announced it would cut salt and sugar in its products by a quarter over the next 10 years. It wants to sell more of its "good for you" products. This appears to meet the needs of regulators.

However, you have to question what is likely to happen. Surely, over time, big food companies have perfected recipes that shoppers enjoy. As the cost of food has fallen in real terms, shoppers then enjoy too much.

In the European Union, a big debate has been running about what size a portion is. Agreement on the size is needed so that regulators can say how much sugar and salt is in the food that the consumer is about to eat or drink.

But on the flip side of this, surely there is a risk that as the sugar and salt content falls, consumers will simply eat more product. On the plus side, that means that you will be selling more. On the minus side, that means the regulators will be thinking up even more ways to make it difficult for shoppers to find treats in your shop.

Independent businesses do not have much leverage over politicians. They often think that your standards are lower than those of the multiples. You need to tell them what the world will look like five years from now and why having shops like yours trading will make that world a better place. To do this, you need to work with like minded traders to get a consistent message across. It may seem like hard work but it is work that might protect your investment from the impact of well intentioned but harmful regulation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...