Skip to main content

A billionaire view of opportunity explained

We sat there for three and a half hours and listened to them talk about the structure of the company and the sale and everything. And I looked over at Jerry Murphy, who is a very, very, very bright guy, and I said, ‘I really don’t understand anything. Am I missing something?’
Jerry says, ‘No. I’m not sure I follow what they’re talking about either.”
So this goes on for three hours-and that is a long time for my dad-until the chairman looks at Dad and says, “Well, Alex, what do you think? Are you interested? You think we can pull this deal together?’
And Dad says, ‘I have one question. I asked that question three hours ago and I’ll ask it again: Does this company make money or not? I’m talking about real, green bucks.’
Nobody in whole room would answer. So Dad gets up and says, ‘When you can answer that question, give me a call; I might be interested.’ And we walked out.
This story is told by Dean Spanos, son of billionaire Alex Spanos and it is the sort of gold dust that makes reading TheSelf-Made Billionaire Effect by John Sviokla and Mitch Cohen rewarding.
Sviokla and Cohen are top guys with PricewaterhouseCoopers and they target their book at the world’s largest corporations in an attempt to answer the question how come so many of the 600 self-made billionaires worked for you but you failed to make a buck.
The billionaires are classified as producers while the big corporations like performers, they conclude. One area that marks billionaires out is their attitude to risk.
For example, 27 year old Yan Cheung used all her savings to start a Hong Kong paper-trading company. Five years later in 1990 she shut down the successful company and moved to California to start over even though she spoke very little English and knew no-one.
Ten years later her new paper trading company was the leading paper exporter in the US. What she saw was the opportunity of the Chinese paper market that needed an abundant supply of paper. The risk of staying in Hong Kong was she could not get the raw material.
“Risk is a matter of perspective,” Sviolka and Cohen argue. “People are more afraid of losing what they have then they are eager to gain something new. Most people overestimate the risk of failure and underestimate the risk of missing out on a gain.”
What producers are not willing to risk is the chance to capture an opportunity.
Spanos worked in his family’s bakery until he was 27 when he set up a roadside sandwich truck to feed migrant workers. This mushroomed into a catering business and then a property business. He is now one of the largest developers of family housing in the US. What he was worried about was missing out on the opportunities for expansion that his father was unwilling to take.
In his son’s story at the top of this column, Spanos was aiming to buy a savings and loan business. The savings and loan he did not invest in was bailed out by the US taxpayer 30 days later.

Are you a producer? Here is a question to ask yourself: What are the most important trends in your industry and what opportunities will they create? If that sparks you to make a billion, don’t forget to look me up.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital disruption in the UK wholesale space

“Twenty years ago I was driving boxes to the post office in my Chevy Blazer and dreaming of a forklift,” says Jeff Bezos in his most recent letter to shareholders. A blink later and he points out that the company has grown from 30,000 employees in 2010 to 230,000 now. But his ambition is the same. “We want to be a large company that’s also an invention machine. We want to combine the extraordinary customer-serving capabilities that are enabled by size with the speed of movement, nimbleness and risk-acceptance mentality that is normally associated with entrepreneurial start-ups.” Amazon is great at disruption because of its customers focus and the fact that the internet means it needs none (or very few) people between its warehouses and the shopper. The threat of Prime, its membership service, is the biggest challenge facing the UK retail market and the wholesale market by extension. It is both a direct threat and an indirect threat in that is inspiring countless numbers of othe...

New look: big copy small?

The owners of B&Q are talking up how they have cut the price of a store refit from £2.5m to £1m by using wood-effect vinyl instead of wood and painted MDF backboards for displays. Managers are learning to live with grey shelving instead of a warmer-looking cream. Shoppers notice the produce, not the fixtures, suggests one executive. Up to a point! Most local retailers will extract the maximum possible life from their fixtures, sometimes taking too long to change equipment that has become tired. As in all business, it is getting the balance right. Shops need to be refreshed and with a purpose.

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.