Skip to main content

Does PayPoint cause footfall?

There is a correlation between the number of storks’ nests found on Danish houses and the number of children born in those houses, economist Tim Harford wrote in the FT last month.
“Could the old story about babies being delivered by storks really be true,” he asked.
“No. Larger houses have more room both for children and for storks.”
The correlation does not cause the outcome.
This distinction is usefully made at a time when retailers in the UK are wrestling with the thorny questions of the benefit of footfall drivers, including the controversial PayPoint service.
Is it that users of PayPoint spend more because the service is available in store or is it that PayPoint is convenient to shoppers who were planning to spend more anyway?
Surely PayPoint seeks to be located in stores which have the correct location more than those stores with the right locations seek to have PayPoint in their stores.
Resolving this distinction is always likely to be determined in favour of whoever pays for the research.

As Mr Harford concluded of statisticians, critics claimed their consulting fees caused their scepticism. But is was just as likely that their scepticism caused the consulting fees.
I suspect the correct answer will always be in the eye of the beholder.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital disruption in the UK wholesale space

“Twenty years ago I was driving boxes to the post office in my Chevy Blazer and dreaming of a forklift,” says Jeff Bezos in his most recent letter to shareholders. A blink later and he points out that the company has grown from 30,000 employees in 2010 to 230,000 now. But his ambition is the same. “We want to be a large company that’s also an invention machine. We want to combine the extraordinary customer-serving capabilities that are enabled by size with the speed of movement, nimbleness and risk-acceptance mentality that is normally associated with entrepreneurial start-ups.” Amazon is great at disruption because of its customers focus and the fact that the internet means it needs none (or very few) people between its warehouses and the shopper. The threat of Prime, its membership service, is the biggest challenge facing the UK retail market and the wholesale market by extension. It is both a direct threat and an indirect threat in that is inspiring countless numbers of othe...

New look: big copy small?

The owners of B&Q are talking up how they have cut the price of a store refit from £2.5m to £1m by using wood-effect vinyl instead of wood and painted MDF backboards for displays. Managers are learning to live with grey shelving instead of a warmer-looking cream. Shoppers notice the produce, not the fixtures, suggests one executive. Up to a point! Most local retailers will extract the maximum possible life from their fixtures, sometimes taking too long to change equipment that has become tired. As in all business, it is getting the balance right. Shops need to be refreshed and with a purpose.

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.