Skip to main content

A defence of Happy Meals!

The chief executive of McDonald's, Jim Skinner, clearly knows why his customers love his company's restaurants and last week attacked US regulators keen to ban children's meals as undermining parents. This follows a decision in San Francisco to ban the sale of toys with food that did not meet limits on calories, sugar and fat.

He told the FT: "We'll continue to sell Happy Meals. We've seen many years of someone trying to dictate behaviour through legislation. Our Happy Meals have been supported by parents since the 1970s. The nutrition of Happy Meals meets FDA guidelines."

For UK local retailers, and their suppliers, this is significant in that most traders fear that the willingness of politicians to legislate to improve the health of the population is out of proportion with the success of many measures. MPs that I have spoken to clearly disagree. They say that the smoking ban is a fantastic success. While they are nervous at the impact on local shops of tobacco measures, these kinds of initiatives still appeal.

For a company like McDonald's to feel confident in taking on the "food police" as Mr Skinner labelled the special interest groups must be good news for small retailers. Think about the lobbying that small retailers are doing on the tobacco display ban and the lack of public comment by the major sellers of tobacco products, including Tesco! Big corporations don't want to be caught in a backlash.

However, Mr Skinner appears to believe he knows why people buy from him: Happy Meals have been working for my customers for 40 years and they still love the format. Shoppers will vote with their wallets. You need to build up a similar story based on your shoppers and use this to provide stories to the local media and local regulators. One thing that will make an MP pause is the concern that he might do something that will be unpopular with a significant number of local voters.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...