Skip to main content

Be a responsible retailer #2

Just prior to Easter the UK's Food Standards Agency unveiled its latest initiatives that will affect how the manufacturers of treats develop products for local shops.

Portion-sizes for single serves was firmly in the front line as the agency targeted chocolate, soft drinks and biscuits. Its recommendations, based on a "public consultation", are the starting gun of the next phase in tackling obesity.

The FSA is asking manufacturers to "make smaller single portion sizes more easily available for chocolate confectionery and soft drinks". It suggests 250ml servings of soft drinks, which may unwind the industry's investment in moving people from 330ml cans to 500ml screw top plastic bottles.

It wants a 10% reduction in saturated fat in filled chocolate bars. Proposals for savoury snacks will follow in the summer.

Unlike salt, which can be reduced gradually, removing fat from foods means changing the recipe. Big manufacturers have invested millions in making their products "better for you".

However, it is again the area of portion control that will cause a greater impact. At the bottom line, people have to change their behaviour and eat less.

While products may be designed with a clear portion size in mind, it is impossible to put them in straightjackets. For example, if a 40g chocolate bar sells at 60p and a 100g bar is on offer at 99p, what is the risk of shoppers trading up and over-eating?

In planning your product ranges, it is probably not too early to start thinking about how much "better-for-you" stock you will make available for shoppers. Even if it is only 2% of your total stock keeping units (SKUs), this category is probably worth promoting loudly.

It is also probably worth investing in some product training for you and your team, so you understand what all the traffic lights and other product information printed on the packaging really means.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The launch of the 2009 IAA

We are launching the 2009 Independent Achievers Academy tomorrow in London with a group of retailers and suppliers. The marketing team have come up with a great practical exercise to help us relive the Academy experience. At its heart, the IAA has a simple concept: set a goal, plan to hit it and celebrate the outcome. I hope to learn lots from participants and will pass this learning on to you.

What do shoppers see

I read a good post (http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/2009/08/28/what-do-newsagents-charge-for-faxing.html) asking what price local shops charge for providing a fax service. The blogger had attached a photograph of his sign with his prices on it. What struck me was the message on the sign. "You drop, we fax," it said. "Pressed for time, drop your documents with us and we'll do it for you at no extra charge." That is a message that will persuade most shoppers that you want to give them good value, even if they stay to do the copying or faxing themselves.

Local advantage? Sainsbury's boss argues it is from his stores.

Online businesses don't pay local taxes, Sainsbury's boss Justin King argues in a big CityAM interview spread. Unlike the web retail businesses, Sainsbury's  "pay business rates at a local level" and "employ people locally" and "pay people locally" and "they spend their earnings locally". "If we are seeing a shift in consumer behaviour towards purchasing online rather than their local store then the government will have to address that the tax system is being usurped by a change in behaviour," he adds.  The point to notice here is that connection of Sainsbury's with "local shop". It is spin. But very effective spin. As any independent retailers who have talked to their MPs about competition from multiples will know, the grocers are very successful at projecting the "local" benefits that they will bring. Perhaps 10 years ago this was true. But supported by a better supply chain, independent...